The silent revolution in energy use - The Warren Report

The UK is consuming less energy than it did in 1965. Andrew Warren asks why there is still a widespread belief that economic development and increased energy use go hand in hand.

Over the past fifty years, our way of life in Britain has changed enormously. The number of cars on the road has practically doubled, the number of gadgets in each home has multiplied exponentially, goods once luxuries are now commonplace.

Since 1965 the wealth of our country, as measured by Gross Domestic Produce (GDP), has increased in real terms by around 270 per cent. In other words, we are each of us on average approaching three times better off in material terms than our counterparts were back then.

In half a century, everything has changed. Apart from one thing. In today’s economy, we use significantly less energy than we did way back in 1965.

Across the UK economy, primary energy consumption in 2014 was 187.9m tonnes of oil equivalent (mtoe). Back in 1965 the equivalent figure in 1965 was 196.8mtoe.

All this material progress has been achieved simultaneously with a complete revolution in the way we use fuel. It is a quite extraordinary turn around which seems to have escaped the attention of the vast majority of people - even those in positions of considerable influence and authority upon us.

That includes those delightfully described as the “chattering classes”- the opinion forming “commentariat” to be found in the media, in Parliament, among senior civil servants, even among some of those who claim to be energy specialists.

Amazingly, a conventional presumption remains that increases in GDP are broadly mirrored by increased in fuel usage. That is why the UK government is continuing to base some of its long-term forecasting upon the quaint belief that electricity consumption will double (in some scenarios, treble) during the first half of this century.

In contrast we already know that, just since 2005, overall energy use has already fallen by 18 per cent. Just in the past year, even while GDP grew by 2.8 per cent, energy sales fell by 6.6 per cent.

I know that such long-term trends come as absolutely no surprise to anybody whose day job it is to manage fuel bills for any half-competent business or institution. But equally I know that many carrying out such professional duties are frequently frustrated at the number of opportunities to “invest to save” still forgone.

When meeting with energy or facility managers, time and again I have been told about all kinds of thoroughly sensible energy-saving investments simply never made. The reasons are legion. They run from an absence of available capital via a lack of appropriately skilled personnel through to an unwillingness to bother.

Many government programmes designed to promote the more efficient use of energy have been introduced since 2000. Few have been persevered with for long enough to be truly effective; there seems to be a perpetual desire from new ministers, new bureaucrats, the moment they arrive in office, to start tinkering around, even with the acknowledged successes.

To read the full article see the latest September edition of EiBI.

Have your say...

Would you like to write your own Comment ?

False energy revolution

Judy | 30/09/2015
I have just read "The silent revolution in energy use - The Warren Report" and I am disappointed that the article has reached such an inaccurate conclusion. "Across the UK economy, primary energy consumption in 2014 was 187.9m tonnes of oil equiva

Your Comment

Your Name*
Please enter Your Name
Email Address*
Please enter an Email Address
Comment Subject*
Please enter a Comment Subject
Please enter your Comments
RefreshPlay AudioHelp
I agree to the terms of use.
Please agree to the terms

There were errors. Please see the messages above.